thejournal.ie 7/9/2014
Opinion: What would Scottish independence mean for
Ireland?
Whoever wins, we might see Ireland brought back into the picture
as part of a broader ‘post-sovereign’ political framework.
THERE
HAS BEEN little connection between the Scottish and Irish national questions
since the nineteenth century. While there were some individual contacts,
Scottish nationalism was often seen as a Protestant-influenced movement, with
little
appeal to the Irish Catholic community.
This
factor has disappeared in recent decades, and during the Celtic Tiger years
Ireland was included in the Scottish National Party’s ‘arc of prosperity’ of
small successful northern European states. Since the economic crisis broke, it
has been quietly omitted.
Northern
Ireland was seen as an example to be avoided and, since the Troubles erupted in
the early 1960s, all parties in Scotland have striven to prevent them spilling
over into the Catholic and Protestant communities of Scotland. British constitutional
strategy has separated the two issues, notably in John Major’s declaration that
the UK had no selfish economic or strategic interest in Northern Ireland. It
was pure coincidence that devolution was restored to Northern Ireland in 1997-9
along with Scotland.
Alliances
between Ireland and Scotland
Scottish
independence would nevertheless affect politics in both parts of Ireland.
Ireland could be expected to welcome Scotland into the European Union, given
the trade and social links between the countries and its support for the
principle of self-determination. There would be numerous opportunities for
alliances between Ireland and Scotland and Scotland could learn from the Irish
how to operate as a small member state.
The
unionist side in the Scottish independence debate has suggested that, if
Scotland were let into the EU, it would have to join the Schengen free-travel
zone, thus leaving the UK-Ireland Common Travel Area and putting up border
posts with England. They do not seem to have asked the Irish (as equal partners
in the CTA) what they thought about the matter or whether they would want to
introduce border controls.
Where
would independence leave Northern Ireland?
There is
considerable concern in Northern Ireland about the implications of Scottish
independence. Unionists recall that the Union of 1800 was with Great Britain,
not England, and ask what the new union would actually be. Like many in Wales,
they fear that the new United Kingdom would be even more unbalanced if the
strongest of its devolved nations were to go, so reinforcing the dominance of
London.
The
unionist community has two points of reference. One is to the Crown based in
London; the other is to their kith and kin in western Scotland, and shared
cultural and religious conditions. The Protestant working class community is
already feeling marginalised. While the settlement has, in effect, guaranteed
the union, they feel like losers in economic and social matters and the
secession of Scotland could leave them feeling more isolated. Northern Ireland
Catholics also have family links to Scotland but these are unlikely to be much
affected.
Mainstream
politicians in Scotland continue to sideline the Irish question and avoid
mixing the issues. The Orange Order in Scotland is a staunch and vocal opponent
of independence but has been ostracised by the official No campaign. The Yes
side presents modern Scotland as a plural and multicultural community, in which
sectarian politics has no place. The west of Scotland and the north of Ireland
were for centuries one cultural and social space, with only a few miles of sea
between them. This is no longer so and Irish considerations have played almost
no role in the current Scottish independence debate.
Questioning
traditional ideas of sovereignty
Yet what
the Irish like to call ‘the totality of relationships among the peoples of
these islands’ could be a way of facing up to a modern world in which
traditional ideas of sovereignty are increasingly irrelevant and new forms of
national accommodation are needed.
Neither
side in Scotland is offering statehood in the traditional sense, however much
they pretend otherwise. The Yes side proposes keeping five of the six unions
(political, currency, monarchical, defence, European and social) that Scotland
currently enjoys. The No side proposes more devolution. Somewhere in between
are the majority of Scots, who do not accept the sharp binary distinction and
want to explore new models of statehood. Both sides accept the European
framework (such a consensus does not exist in England).
Whoever
wins, we might see Ireland brought back into the picture as part of a
broader framework, for what some of us have called a post-sovereign
political order in which multiple political identities can co-exist without
each having to have its own exclusive state.
Michael
Keating is Professor of Politics at the University of Aberdeen and is a Fellow
of the British Academy, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the Academy of Social
Sciences and the European Academy. He has taught at universities in Scotland,
England, Canada, Italy, France and Spain. Currently, he is director of the
Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change, a major programme examining the
referendum in Scotland.
Sinn Féin Mountmellick – Serving The Community
(Reuters) - Supporters of Scottish independence have taken
their first opinion poll lead since the referendum campaign began, according to
a YouGov survey for the Sunday Times newspaper.
With less than two weeks to go before the Sept. 18 vote, the poll puts the "Yes" to independence campaign on 51
percent, with the unionists on 49 percent, overturning a 22-point lead for the
unionist campaign in just a month, the Sunday Times said.
The
paper announced the headline results in a news release ahead of publication. No
further details of the poll were immediately available.
"The
YouGov survey ... shows that the nationalists have taken a two-point lead and
are poised to triumph in the referendum," the paper said.
After
months of surveys showing nationalists heading for defeat, recent polls have
been showing the gap narrowing to the extent that they raise the real prospect
that secessionists led by Alex Salmond's Scottish National Party (SNP) could
achieve their goal of breaking the 307-year-old union with England.
A
previous YouGov poll on Sept. 1 put the lead for the "no" to
secession campaign at just six points, down from 14 points in the middle of
August and 22 points at the start of that month.
But
the latest average of the polls, issued on Sept. 1 by Strathclyde University
Professor of Politics John Curtice, still shows the unionist lead at 10 points.
The
late showing by the independence camp has hit sterling on the foreign exchanges
and electrified Britain's political class after its summer break.
A
vote to break away would be followed by negotiations with London on what to do
about the currency, the national debt, North Sea oil and the future of
Britain's nuclear submarine base in Scotland ahead of independence pencilled in
for March 24, 2016.
If Scots voted to leave the United Kingdom, Prime Minister David
Cameron would face calls to resign ahead of a national election in May 2015
while the opposition Labour party's chances of gaining a majority could be
scuppered if it lost its Scottish lawmakers.
Cameron,
who is due to visit Queen Elizabeth in Scotland on Sunday, has insisted he will
not resign.
Nationalists
accuse London of squandering Scotland's wealth and say Scotland would be one of
the world's richest countries if it took control of its own destiny.
Unionists,
including Britain's three main political parties, say the United Kingdom is
stronger if it stays together and that Scottish independence would bring
significant financial, economic and political uncertainty.
Politicians
from the "Better Together" unionist campaign have been trying to
tempt Scots with offers of greater devolution.
This
week, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, himself a Scot, promised Edinburgh
more powers over its tax, social and economic affairs if Scots voted against
independence.
The Observer
newspaper, in an advance extract of its Sunday edition, said British ministers
planned to make further concrete offers in coming days to allow Scots to devise
a federal future for their country
Makem and Clancy Sound the Pibroch - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXX1Qp3tqUI
Mar 11, 2008 - Uploaded by menbehindthesweaters
At the National Stadium in Dublin, February 1977 For more info check out the first full length biography of the ...
Sinn Féin
Mountmellick – Serving The Community
There can only be one type of devolution for Scotland and that is Self Rule. anything less is a cop out.
ReplyDeleteAlba gu bràth!