Adams:
What are my accusers' motives?
Press TV 8th May
I had contacted the PSNI in March to tell them I was available to meet
them. This followed another intense round of the media speculation that has
tried to link me to the killing in 1972 of Jean McConville. It is part of a
sustained malicious, untruthful and sinister campaign going back many years.
Last Monday the PSNI said it wanted to speak to me. I was concerned
about the timing. Sinn Féin is currently involved in very important EU and
local government elections. Notwithstanding this, I travelled to the Antrim
serious crime suite where I arrived at 8.05pm.
En route I talked to the senior investigating officer. He was insisting
that I meet him in the car park opposite the PSNI barracks. He told me that I
must get into a squad car and that he would then arrest me and drive me into
the barracks. He said he couldn't arrest me inside the barracks under the
legislation.
I told him I was going directly to the station of my own accord,
voluntarily. As it turned out there is no legislative bar on me being arrested within
the station. And subsequently that's exactly what happened.
My solicitor was present. I was escorted by two detectives from Remit to
the serious crime suite. A custody sergeant took me through all of the
processes and protocols. My belt, tie, comb, watch, Fáinne and Easter Lily pins
were removed. My solicitor made representations that I be allowed to keep my
pen and notebook given that the offence that I was accused of occurred 42 years
ago. After some toing and froing, I was eventually granted this request by the
custody superintendent.
Shortly before the first of 33 taped interviews, I was served with a
pre-interview brief. This accused me of IRA membership and conspiracy in the
murder of Jean McConville. It also claimed that the PSNI had new evidential
material to put to me. The interview commenced at 10.55pm. Two interrogators –
a man and a woman – conducted all the interrogations. All of this was recorded
and videotaped. My private consultations with my solicitor may also have been
covertly recorded.
I was told that the interrogations were an evidence-gathering process,
and that the police would be making the case that I was a member of the IRA;
that I had a senior IRA managerial role in Belfast at the time of Jean
McConville's abduction; and that I was therefore bound to know about her
killing. I challenged my interrogators to produce the new evidential material.
They said that this would happen at a later interview but they wanted to take
me through my childhood, family history and so on. Over the following four days
it became clear that the objective of the interviews was to get to the point
where they could charge me with IRA membership and thereby link me to the
McConville case. The membership charge was clearly their principal goal. The
interrogators made no secret of this. At one point the male detective described
their plan as "a stage-managed approach". It later transpired that it
was a phased strategy, with nine different phases.
The first phases dealt with my family history of republican activism. My
own early involvement in Sinn Féin as a teenager – when it was a banned
organization. My time in the 1960s in the civil rights movement and various
housing action groups in west Belfast, the pogroms of 1969 and the start of the
Troubles.
It was asserted that I was guilty of IRA membership through association
because of my family background – my friends. They referred to countless pieces
of "open source" material that, they said, linked me to the IRA.
These were anonymous newspaper articles from 1971 and 1972, photographs of
Martin McGuinness and me at republican funerals, and books about the period.
If any of these claimed I was in the IRA, then that was, according to my
interrogators, evidence. They consistently cast up my habit of referring to friends
as "comrades". This, they said, was evidence of IRA membership. They
claimed I was turned by special branch during interrogations in Belfast's
Palace Barracks in 1972 and that I became an MI5 agent! They also spoke about
the peace talks in 1972, and my periods of internment and imprisonment in Long
Kesh. This was presented as "bad-character evidence".
Much of the interrogations concerned Boston College's so-called Belfast
Project conceived by Paul Bew – a university lecturer and a former adviser to the
former unionist leader David Trimble – and run by Ed Moloney and Anthony
McIntyre.
Both Moloney and McIntyre are opponents of the Sinn Féin leadership and
our strategy, and have interviewed former republicans who are also hostile.
These former republicans have accused us of betrayal and have said we should be
shot because of our support for the Good Friday agreement and policing.
The allegation of conspiracy in the killing of Mrs McConville is based
almost exclusively on hearsay from unnamed alleged Boston College interviewees
but mainly from the late Dolours Price and Brendan Hughes. Other alleged
interviewees were identified only by a letter of the alphabet, eg interviewee R
or Y. It has been claimed by prosecutors in court that one of these is Ivor Bell,
although the interrogators told me he has denied the allegations.
I rejected all allegations made about me in the Boston tapes, which have
now been totally discredited. Historians from the college have made it clear
that this "never was a Boston College History Department project". A
spokesman for the college has confirmed that it would be prepared to hand back
interviews to those involved.
I am innocent of any involvement in the abduction, killing or burial of
Mrs McConville, or of IRA membership. I have never disassociated myself from
the IRA and I never will, but I am not uncritical of IRA actions and
particularly the terrible injustice inflicted on Mrs McConville and her family.
I very much regret what happened to them and their mother and understand the
antipathy they feel towards republicans.
This case raises in a stark way the need for the legacy issues of the
past to be addressed in a victim-centered way. Sinn Féin is committed to
dealing with the past, including the issue of victims and their families. We
have put forward our own proposals for an independent international truth
recovery process, which both governments have rejected. We have also signed up
for the compromise proposals presented by US envoys Richard Haass and Meghan
O'Sullivan. The two unionist parties and the British government have not.
Sinn Féin is for policing. There is no doubt about this. Civic,
accountable, public service policing. It has not been achieved yet.
During my interrogation, no new evidential material, indeed no evidence
of any kind, was produced. When I was being released I made a formal complaint
about aspects of my interrogation. My arrest and the very serious attempt to
charge me with IRA membership is damaging to the peace process and the
political institutions.
There is only one way for our society to go, and that is forward.I am a
united Irelander. I want to live in a citizen-centered, rights-based society.
There is now a peaceful and democratic way to achieve this. The two governments
are guarantors of the Good Friday agreement. They have failed in this
responsibility. The future belongs to everyone. So, as well as the British and
Irish governments, civic society, church leaders, trade unions, the media,
academia and private citizens must find a way to provide positive leadership.
The Good Friday agreement is the people's agreement. It does not belong
to the elites. It must be defended, implemented and promoted.
Yes, deal with the past. Yes, deal with victims. But the focus needs to
be on the future. There will be bumps on that road. There will be diversions.
There are powerful vested interests who have not bought into the peace process.
Obstacles will be erected, but we must build the peace and see off sinister
forces against equality and justice for everyone.
SRK/MAM/MHB
Sinn Féin Mountmellick – Serving The
Community
No comments:
Post a Comment