Ireland Needs To Get This Right
EPA refuses to finalize study blaming fracking for
water pollution
The US Environmental Protection Agency has dropped its plans to
further investigate whether or not fracking led to the contamination of a
Wyoming aquifer, and the agency no longer plans to write a report on the
matter.
The EPA in 2011 released a draft report, which revealed that
hydraulic fracturing fluids used at a shale gas drilling site had likely
contaminated groundwater in Pavillion, Wyoming. Oil and gas companies have long
argued that fracking poses no water contamination risks, but the EPA’s results
demonstrated otherwise.
Critics of the findings, including Wyoming state
officials and drilling advocates, argued that the EPA conducted a poor and
inaccurate study, which could ultimately harm the industry. Despite the initial
wave of criticism in 2011, EPA officials planned to resume the study and
continue making assessments regarding the influence of fracking on groundwater.
But the EPA on Thursday
abandoned those plans, announcing that state officials will instead take over
the investigation into Pavillion’s water pollution and draw up a conclusion in
2014.
"We think this is the most pragmatic, quickest way to help the
residents of Pavillion. We're going to work hand in hand with the state to make
sure this investigation moves forward," EPA spokesman Tom Reynolds
announced in Washington, D.C.
Wyoming will receive a $1.5 million grant from
Encana Corp.’s US oil and gas subsidiary, which owns the Pavillion gas field in
question. The state plans to issue a final report about its findings in late
2014. Industry officials and drilling proponents have praised the decision to
hand over responsibility of the study to Wyoming state officials.
"EPA
has to do a better job, because another fatally flawed water study could have a
big impact on how the nation develops its massive energy resources,"
Erik Milito, from the Washington, D.C.-based American Petroleum Institute, said
in a news release.
“The EPA has been on a witch hunt to shut down hydraulic
fracturing,” Sen. David Vitter, the top Republican on the Senate
Environment and Public Works committee, told Reuters.
Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead
said in a news release that letting state officials run the investigation is “in
everyone’s best interest”, since it would lead to “an unbiased,
scientifically supportable conclusion.”
But Mead, a known advocate of
drilling, has made no attempt to hide his own biases. Last September, Mead
asked the Interior Department to abandon fracking rules, claiming that it was
unnecessary to request companies to disclose the chemicals they inject down
well bores. He has long opposed having any federal fracking rules, and urges
lawmakers to let states make their own decisions.
And the Native Americans who live around the fracking site may not
even take part in the study, despite the fact that contaminated groundwater has
the greatest impact on their tribe. The Northern Arapaho Tribe, which lives on
a reservation surrounding Pavillion, has long sought to maintain a role in the
investigation. But a tribal official told AP that the EPA has stopped
consulting with the community.
"They
have a legal duty to consult with the tribe and that didn't happen as part of
their dialogue with the governor," Ronald Oldman,
co-chairman of the tribe's business council, said in a statement.
It is
unclear why the EPA abandoned the study, but with state officials – many of
which are fracking proponents – leading the investigation, the results could
look very different from the 2011 draft report that linked fracking chemicals
to groundwater contamination
RT
23rd June 2013
Sinn Féin Mountmellick Serving The Community
Sinn Féin Mountmellick Serving The Community
No comments:
Post a Comment